what’s in a name? The whole point is something to believe in when you look at the hype surrounding Facebook’s recent switch to Meta. In fact, of course, the new name is more than a whistleblower scandal, in addition to previous controversies that have weakened the company’s image, as well as protests against rival social media platforms that are more popular among young people.

But while it’s easy for skeptics to dismiss Facebook’s rebranding as a publicity stunt, the same cannot be said of Metaverse, simply because it requires more than publicity to access it. Together with Facebook’s own investment of 10 billion dollars in metaverse projects, Microsoft only this year creates its own metaverse and releases 3D avatars for teams. Earlier in April, Epic Games, the gaming giant behind teen favorite Fortnite, raised $ 1 billion for its metaverse efforts. Many top players speed up their engines to race in Metaverse, and money helps get things done.

At this point, however, it is still unclear exactly what money can achieve in this particular case, because it seems unclear what Metaverse will actually look like. Most commentators see it as a VR / AR-rich interface for interacting online with other people and online services, and it’s a clever futuristic technology that we see in movies like Ready Player One, where users navigate the web world using 3D images. By creating a virtual world where anything can happen, Facebook and Microsoft have definitely stained their creative muscles with 3D business meetings, right?

But let’s pretend, if only for the sake of argument, that there would be something really useful: a human-machine interface, made up of a variety of technologies, to change the way we interact with the world of connected devices. We put on the augmented reality glasses (AR) that Facebook has already introduced, unlike the ones that Google had to get rid of, and our home is transformed into a tropical island hub where we can get in touch with friends from all over the world and get access to them. not just websites, but full experiences and working in the same virtual space are like artificial intelligence-enabled tools that help us do this job. Our virtual image can also cross the real world and appear on the glasses of other users, depending on the location we choose. Thus, we enjoy live streaming from the available cameras, or even get a good projection of the vantage point, more or less calculated from it.

Is all this a complete technological revolution? Even when we fantasized at full speed, it’s still hard to say. Would you rather read this article from a virtual sheet that can be folded into a crane or hung on the wall of your virtual home, instead of from a computer monitor or cell phone? Otherwise, Metaverse may not be as destructive as the engineers hoped. But then, who knows. In ten years, the meta-verse may be as ubiquitous as cell phones are today.

There is no doubt that a lot of work remains for this. Future residents of Metaverse need VR and AR solutions to infiltrate it, and new platforms and protocols need to emerge to combine the different fragments of Metaverse into one cohesive, cohesive experience. And I’m pretty sure that if we do not want Metaverset to be suppressed and censored, as the Internet is today, the Meta universe must live and breathe decentralization.

Related topics: Decentralization vs centralization: Where is the future? Expert answer

The blocks that hold the world
Blockchain is first and foremost a database. Databases are not necessarily interesting in themselves, but what you can build around them is interesting. Ethereum is the best example of this, and works primarily for a growing ecosystem that includes games, finance, digital art and more. There is no central authority, community management and no supervision – which means that the crypto wallet is anonymous even if transactions are verified on the blockchain.

It is important to ensure that the same principles are at the heart of Metaverse, simply because without them you would have opened up a whole new place for the same dubious business practices we see today. Here’s just one example: You used to have CDs with movie copies, but you do not have programs on Netflix. Imagine that you do not have your own avatar, and you are also introduced to a brave new world. Why not use NFT as a symbol to prove that you own a certain virtual mask in the database that no one else owns?

LEAVE A REPLY