Earlier this year, Telegram announced that it was leaving the Telegram Open Network, to avert the fallout from a drawn-out legal battle with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

But since TON was an open source project and all of the code was published on GitHub, the story is far from over.

Here, Ton Lab Chief Technology Officer Mitya Goroshevsky explains how a “devastating” failure turned into a decentralized movement involving tens of thousands of people.

1. What happened after leaving Telegram TON?

The community came together and independently launched the Free TON network based on TON technology.

The first version of the Decentralization Declaration on Decentralization has been prepared. As others started contributing and adding to it, more and more contributors got involved – commenting, correcting, helping him grow – until things went quickly like a breakdown.

There have been people involved and interested in TON from the very beginning. They were happy to start the project as a community – to spread the word across their networks. After all, it quickly grew as a community enterprise.

2. Is the messaging app involved in the project?

No, Telegram has publicly announced that it is leaving the project entirely.

3. What inspired Free TON?

I think it was a normal reaction. When so many people put so much time and energy into a project that they suddenly slam their hands on the grounds that the money was being raised differently than anyone else, that’s horrific.

Suddenly, amazing technologies will be withdrawn from these people without the possibility of their further development.

It was hard to swallow. Nobody expressed it directly, but it did.

This is not the way the free world should operate. Free TON has proven this.

4. What makes Free TON different from the planned open Telegram network?

I think the main difference is a very strong community that promotes development at both the technical and managerial levels.

In the original TON, there was no clear and public view of how governance would work.

In the original design, the steering was too naive. Auditors vote to approve protocol changes, and that’s it. There was simply no vision for how to involve the community in running the platform.

Free TON has come with a more open approach because it is now about community. Several technical changes have been made, and more will be introduced as we progress. The developer and ecosystem tools look completely different and there are many changes to the protocols.

5. When was Free TON mainnet launched?

Free TON launched on May 7 and has been in business ever since. We called it the beta network, but it was never a re-blueprint for the main network.

This is a gradual transition and the definition of the main network is somewhat ambiguous. The more decentralized it is, the closer it is to memory. With the current addition of nearly 400 auditors, I would say this is the same main network as any other.

6. There is a Competitive Area – How is Free TON different from other locks?

Free TON is technically one of the fastest and most scalable networks in existence today. It has a unique design thanks to its multi-colored carved architecture. This allows it to have one of the fastest block generation times – currently 0.2 seconds on average across the network – and virtually unlimited scalability.

Important note: These numbers are from a completely unlicensed network on the public internet … not a lab. It works now. It contains very mature developer tools and supports various programming languages ​​and dozens of platforms.

But Free TON’s power comes from a community in which thousands of people participate in governance activities. They participate in hundreds of decisions and build utility networks for the network.

Proof of stake blockchain chains usually start selling tokens to future auditors to create a springboard in this gaming economy. At Free TON, everyone immediately realized that the tokens should not be sold to anyone. The mystery we needed to solve was how we can distribute the tokens in this way using game theory, but still be solved by POS.

Free TON found a revolutionary solution to this problem in the merit token distribution model. It starts with presenting the community a contest in which all other members can participate. A competition is discussed and a majority vote is used to decide whether to proceed with the proposal.

Now any member of the community can participate by submitting their work to competitions. Finally, a jury made up of community members is allocated the entries and symbols for the winners, respectively.

7- What are the biggest challenges Free TON has faced since its launch?

Source: CoinTelegraph

LEAVE A REPLY