Nigel Farage, an opponent of the British Conservative Party, went for “full encryption.”

Last Friday, Farage gave a video interview to discuss all cryptocurrencies with Sam Falkering, editor of Southbank Investment Research, especially the publisher of the recently released Fortune & Freedom newsletter.

In an interview, Farage ridiculed the government’s “fun money” that is still being printed throughout the pandemic, concluding that it was “extremely important” to turn heads around cryptocurrency.

Elsewhere, he has called Bitcoin “the ultimate investment against isolation” – especially with regard to the brand of his newly formed British Reform Party.

Farage and Volking’s video interview seems to be the first in a series that teaches viewers to buy, store and keep cryptocurrencies safe.

It seems that journalists from The Financial Times have long assumed that cryptocurrency is the main focus of politics. “It was just a matter of time,” said Alphaville columnist Jemima Kelly.

It is difficult to argue with the evidence for a “deterministic” cryptographic axis. Farages Fortune & Freedom introduces itself to audiences seeking to “grow their fortunes” in “New Britain Unleashed after Brexit.” Farage, a former trader, told readers that after gaining political freedom thanks to Brexit, it was time for them to get their money and destiny back in their own hands.

Other newsletters published by Southbank Investment Research include headlines such as “Short the World”, “Crypto Profits Extreme” and “Exponential Investor Premium”. Volkering is an “emerging digital real estate authority”, which first bought back Bitcoin in 2011 and “followed the wild west of cryptocurrencies.”

He is also the author of a book entitled “Cryptorevolution: Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency and the Future of Money”, also published by Southbank Investment Research. Kelly highly recommends this book as a great gift for FT readers who may end up with a despicable colleague in their secret Christmas office in 2020.

Despite FT’s shameless aversion to Farage and his other cryptocurrency enthusiasts, some of the implications for Fortune & Freedom seem more selective than the alleged free market values ​​of Brexit supporters.

The close links between the libertarian movement and the regular Atlanteans in the Leave the Vote campaign are still well documented. A British government source said that “not even Margaret Thatcher, or money theory at best, considered such a shock therapy” as Brexit advocates, focusing on the unilateral opening of Britain to the US market and radical economic liberalization of the country.

However, Farage’s newsletter partner Nick Hubble published an article on Thursday in which he claimed Keynes and Friedman died of COVID-19 and defended the “radical future” that today’s critics have promised.

MMT claims that governments create demand for their fiat currencies by taxing citizens. Therefore, money is considered as a unit of account for credit and debt, which can be created and destroyed at the discretion of sovereign states. MMT creator Stephanie Kelton writes that the state can “afford to buy everything sold in its unit of account.”

This is a view that strongly contradicts the belief of many bitcoiners that loose monetary policy represents perceived inflationary depreciation.

It remains to be seen how Hubble combines its apparent pursuit of conservative methadone treatment with its earlier view that cryptocurrencies “represent the first reflection of government theft […] in hundreds of years.”

As Britain prepares for its worst shock in 300 years due to the combined effects of coronavirus and Brexit, the spirit of critical scientists, if not the message, may prevail according to Milton Friedman’s mythical principle: causes real change … When this crisis occurs, the actions depend on the ideas around it. ”

Whether it’s MMT, the cryptocurrency revolution or the Farage-Hubble eclecticism, something will be presented as ready to be delivered to a handful of selected recipients of Britain’s dual crisis by 2020. After all, this is the perfect time for the preferred alternative conversion. For some, from “politically impossible” to “political determinism”.

Source: CoinTelegraph

LEAVE A REPLY